Wednesday 27 January 2010

F

ORTUNATE, FREEDOM, FORTHCOMING

It is Wednesday, Jan 27th. Today marks the end of my first week in Delhi. I have already had a number of stimulating conversations surrounding development. Three conversations made a lasting impression on me. All were conversations with local Indians and hence, I felt naturally inclined to listen to their opinions. But it was more than an exercise of listening, it was using my knowledge and curiosity to learn about their own insights.

This weekend I visited Khan Market, an upper class market of Delhi that boasts American and European style restaurants and shops along with Expats and tourists. I went to a brunch spot with two friends. The family who sat down next to us included a young woman who carried a Luis Vuitton purse. It was the second or third time in two days that I had seen a young woman carrying a very expensive designer bag. I could imagine seeing someone carrying a very expensive bag on one occasion, but I was very surprised to see it more than a couple of times. I had been aware of the upper class in Delhi, however I kept thinking I had no idea that they their wealth was so large that it could be seen from even the handbag they carried. I mentioned my surprise to my friends who proceeded to tell me about a trend of corruption. They told me that there were tons of corrupt government officials who often have loads of cash that they need to get rid of and as such, spend on something like a handbag. This was my first encounter with the truly ‘fortunate’ of Delhi. This experience not only showed me how prevalent corruption may be in the Indian government but also how much it is common knowledge, yet ignored. Of course I knew of the immense amount of corruption before this incident, however, I am now interested in the reasons for why it is ignored. I have some thoughts on this matter but I will comment further in a later entry that I dedicate solely to corruption.

My second conversation was with a lady who owns the local parlor where I got my eyebrows threaded. The lady right away knew from my accent that I was not from India, so she asked where I was from and why I was here. I tried to explain the type of job I was looking for to the best of my ability and I figured the easiest way would be to talk about poverty reduction. In a very friendly manner, the parlor owner took a few minutes to discuss with me why she believed that Indians on the streets of Delhi could never be helped. She told me that multiple times she has gone to the streets and asked youth if they wish to come work at her parlor. She told them she would give them a job and salary, however, each time she was refused. I asked her why and she answered that they did not want to leave the streets because the street life gives them freedom. I told her that they would accept her offer if they were starving – she told me that they were not starving. The parlor owner also told me that the Indians who are poor are so because they are not hard working. To a certain extent I can understand what she is saying – both the freedom and the lazy arguments. If someone earns enough to sustain a certain way of life that they are comfortable with, they are unlikely to work harder to achieve something more. I think it is a global phenomenon that few people aspire to pursue aspirations that are outside of their comfort zones – as long as one is satisfied with their situation, they will tend to continue as is. Analyses of social networks show results that indicate this tendency to be true. I believe that this tendency may be true, however there is no perfect way to analyze it and hence, the more important question is, for those who do desire a life off the streets with a steady food supply and shelter, are there opportunities for them to do so?

My final conversation took place yesterday with my cousin. Since my interest within development is particular to Information and Communications Technology for Development, we discussed the forthcoming of India’s transformation through technology. We spoke about the use of mobile phones for e-agribusiness – rural farmers receiving local market prices on their phones and using this information to determine where and when to sell their produce. The transformation that we spoke about was not only about acknowledging the landowner who begins to earn more by selling at highest paying market, but his ‘empowerment’ through this new way of running his business and hence, his increasingly positive attitude towards his laborers and finally, his eventual passing along of the farm to a neighbor or prized laborer while he himself moves into a more profitable business. This, of course, is the picture perfect transition story and it is not so simple for technology to catalyze such a huge transformation; However, I do believe that ICT has a huge potential to change the economic, political and social lives of nearly everyone across the globe.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Hooray for hegemony! It is truly one of the most bizarre phenomena. It's amazing that you are already having such politicized conversations; such an incredible experience. It's so difficult to truly understand the experiences and motivations of people whose lives are and have been so different from our own. You have so much more to learn young grasshopper!